Don't waste my time! (On "patient autonomy," health insurance, and doctors' offices)

Don't waste my time! (On "patient autonomy," health insurance, and doctors' offices)

If there's one thing that makes my blood boil, it's having my time wasted. I only have so much, and I waste enough of it myself that I really can't afford to lose any to others' incompetence.

Unfortunately, one of many frustrations that come with a chronic illness—like celiac disease, which I have—is wasted time. Managing celiac disease takes a fairly large toll on my time in the form of food research and preparation—though that's, arguably, time valuably spent rather than wasted. Far more annoying, really, is dealing with doctors.

"Regret for wasted time is more wasted time."—Mason Cooley Oh, shut up. (Image © JD | Flickr)

I, for example, have an HMO (health maintenance organization) insurance plan. The main difference between that and a PPO (preferred provider organization) plan is having to be referred by a primary care physician (PCP) in order to see a specialist. Even a specialist specializing in the chronic condition I will have for the rest of my life 

Researchers have actually felt the need—and gotten funding—to study the benefits of long-term follow-up care for celiac disease patients. Turns out (surprise!) it's good for us. (See, e.g., this article in the Canada Journal of Gastroenterology.)

Judging from that, for the rest of my life, or at least the next few years, I should see a celiac disease specialist now and again. So can't I just have a standing referral?

No.

Instead, before I can see my gastroenterologist to try to find out why I still feel crappy after over a year of being as carefully gluten-free as can be, I have to:

  1. call my PCP's office
  2. wait on hold
  3. talk with a receptionist who seems determined not to understand what I'm asking for or help me to get it
  4. wait nearly a week for a return phone call
  5. follow up myself
  6. learn they need me to supply the doctor's ID number (whether they were planning to ever, oh, call me for that information, or why they couldn't ask me for it the first time I called, I do not know)
  7. tell them the ID number
  8. be advised to see my primary care doctor about whether I need to see the specialist
  9. snap that I have a chronic condition that my doctor already knows about
  10. feel bad for losing my temper
  11. agree to wait several days more for them to put through the referral
  12. and then and only then, finally, make the appointment with the specialist I already saw a year ago, who we all know I need to see.

I understand Oxford wants me to get referrals rather than run around willy-nilly to specialists and expect insurance to pay for it. They don't trust me to know who to see, and why should they? Most people are idiots, and I haven't proven to them that I'm not. But wouldn't it be nice if I could?

Look, I've been SAT tutoring for a while now, and if there's one thing SAT tutoring will do, it's turn everyone involved off of standardized tests. But some tests are necessary proving grounds or barriers to entry. No one wants people behind the wheel who haven't passed a driving test, right?

So what if there were a test for basic medical common sense? Since "the prevailing ethical mantra in medicine" is supposedly patient autonomy (scoff), we could call it the PAT (Patient Autonomy Test). Those who passed could be trusted to refer themselves to specialists.

Insurance companies should be on board with this—after all, if I wind up needing to see a specialist, they lose money by making me see another doctor first to get the go-ahead. With the PAT, we all save money (and time).

Questions might include:

What kind of doctor should you see if you have a lifelong disease primarily affecting your gastrointestinal tract?
a) a gastroenterologist
b) a podiatrist
c) a cardiologist
d) none of the above

In your opinion, specialists and specialized medical tests and procedures are:
a) fun toys to enjoy at a whim
b) resources to turn to under specific, necessary circumstances
c) both

Are you:
a) a child
b) an adult capable of rational thought
c) a complete idiot
d) really struggling with these test questions

A quick reading comprehension portion on a passage describing recommended follow-up care for a specific condition could come next. And then a section on triangles, because—as my SAT students could tell you—that's stuff we all really need to know.

bubbling an answer on standardized test with pencilDon't make any stray marks, now. (Image © biologycorner | Flickr)

What time wasters get your blood pressure up? 

--
Molly
Based on a Sprue Story
http://spruestory.com | @spruestory

Related Posts

The Ethics of Concierge Medicine

For those of you too young to remember, Marcus Welby, M.D. was a TV show that began its seven-year run in 1969 and starred Robert Young as a family practitioner with a kind heart and superb bedside manner. The doctor epitomized the type of doctor that is now a thing of the past: The patient, unhurried professional who sat and talked to patients for as long as was necessary, not only to understand the patient's symptoms and complaints, but to understand the whole patient. The type of doctor who would come to you if you were too sick to go to the doctor. The type who could practically heal you with just a touch. For many of us, this type of doctor wasn't a privilege -- it was a right. This is the type of doctor we wish we had today.   Read more >

When Money Collides with Cancer Treatments: How the Economy is Affecting Health Care Decisions

There is never a good time to find out you have cancer, but now may prove to be the worst time.  With the economy and health care crisis making day to day life more costly for many Americans, a cancer diagnosis can be financially devastating.  At the exact time a cancer patient needs to find the strength to fight for their life, they now need to worry just as much about whether or not they can afford treatment.  There's just something fundamentally wrong with that.   Read more >

BlogHer Participates in White House Roundtable on the Affordable Care Act

Editor's Note, 3/27/12: Melissa finished this post on her trip to the White House Affordable Care Act roundtable last week with a call for you to weigh in and share your story. As the Supreme Court hears arguments on the constitutionality of various aspects of the act this week, we want to keep the BlogHer roundtable going. What's your insurance situation? How do you feel about the legislation? Share your story in the comments below. -- Julie Today, I attended a small roundtable discussion with 11 other women in the Roosevelt room at the White House. We talked about the Affordable Care Act and how it is playing out in the actual lives of women. Leading the discussion were Deputy Chief of Staff, Nancy-Ann DeParle, and Deputy Assistant to the President for Health Policy, Jeanne Lambrew.   Read more >

Comments

In order to comment on BlogHer.com, you'll need to be logged in. You'll be given the option to log in or create an account when you publish your comment. If you do not log in or create an account, your comment will not be displayed.